0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡¸Å³ëÀÎÀÇ ÅëÁõ»çÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÚ°¡º¸°í µµ±¸ÀÇ Å¸´çµµ, ½Å·Úµµ ¹× È¿À²¼º °ËÁõ

Validity, Reliability and Efficiency of Pain Self-report Scale in Elderly with Dementia

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 23±Ç 2È£ p.111 ~ 122
KMID : 0367020110230020111
·ù¾ð³ª ( Ryoo Eon-Na ) - Àû½ÊÀÚ°£È£´ëÇÐ

¹Ú°æ¼÷ ( Park Kyung-Sook ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The aim on this study was to establish the validity, reliability and efficiency of a Pain Self-Report Scale for elderly with dementia and compare these results with an observational pain rating scale.

Methods: Study subjects were 136 elderly with dementia who were residents in a nursing home, geriatric hospital, or day care center. The subject¡¯s pain was measured by five self-report scales and observational scale. DS-DAT (discomfort scale-dementia of the Alzheimer¡¯s type) was used for pain behavior observational measure. Cognitive state was assessed using the MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination).

Results: Observational rating correlated moderately with self-report (r=.225~.585, p£¼.05) and tended to underestimate pain intensity. Test-retest reliability was high for all five self-report scales, and the correlation between these scales was very strong (r=.735~.856, p£¼.05). Comprehension rate of VDS (verbal descriptor scale) was 88.3%, and NRS (numeric rating scale) 69.9%, FPS (face pain scale) 66.9%, HVAS (horizontal visual analog scale) and VVAS (vertical visual analog scale) 65.4%.

Conclusion: Nurses should not apply observational scales routinely in demented patients as many of these are capable of reporting their own pain. Self-report, the highest standard of pain measurement can be reliably performed in a large proportion of demented elderly.
KeyWords
ÅëÁõ, ÅëÁõÃøÁ¤, Ä¡¸Å
Pain, Pain measurement, Dementia
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed